Usability Testing (19)
UX (12) | Usability Testing Topics
 Jeff Sauro • May 15, 2012 Errors can be categorized as slips (like a typo) or a mistake (incorrect goal) and are common occurrences in usability tests. Errors are often caused by problems in an interface and lead to longer task times, higher task failure and lower satisfaction ratings. While errors can't be entirely eliminated, they can often be reduced substantially be reducing the opportunity for an error.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • May 1, 2012 When it comes to testing websites there are many unmoderated and moderated solutions. But if you've ever tried to evaluate an app or website on a mobile phone or tablet there are fewer options. Here's our solution.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • April 10, 2012 Despite the rise in unmoderated usability testing, the bulk of evaluations are still done with a facilitator.
Whether you are sitting next to the user in a lab or sharing screens with someone thousands of miles away, here are 20 practical tips for your next moderated usability test.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • February 29, 2012 After the successful webinar on Best Practices for Remote Usability Testing, we received many questions about how I performed the analysis: sample size questions, time on task and other logistic issues are covered.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • January 17, 2012 There are advantages and disadvantages to the different usability testing methods: lab-based, remote moderated and remote unmoderated. A combination of methods provides a more comprehensive picture of the user experience but is not always possible. Consider these nine factors when deciding on a method.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • November 8, 2011 There are many great methods for gathering insights from users and many more software tools. Here are the tools and services I use when conducting user research.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • February 14, 2011 To know if design changes improved the usability of an application, you first need a baseline measure of usability from a benchmark test. Benchmark usability tests don't happen a lot, so to help you in your next test I've assembled a list of ten tips to help you get the most out of your effort.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • November 23, 2010 Survey results show completion rates and UI problems dominate formative usability tests. Task time data is more common in summative usability tests, yet still prevalent in formative tests. At least half of respondents use some form of usability questionnaire in both types of tests.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • November 9, 2010 System Usability Scale (SUS) Scores from users who had only 5 seconds to assess the usability of a website were statistically indistinguishable from users who had no time limit. Users who had only 60 seconds on a website tend to rate websites as more usable than those who had only 5 seconds or no time limit.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • November 2, 2010 The results of an email survey found 80% of Formative usability tests have less than 15 users. Summative usability test sample sizes are around 3 times larger for respondents who conducted both types of tests.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • October 27, 2010 In a usability test we're taught to be neutral observers of user behavior. But what actually happens in practice? A review of 14 usability testing sessions from seven companies suggests that what we preach is a bit different than what we practice.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • September 29, 2010 Usability problem frequencies from 24 usability tests show that users are almost ten-times more likely to encounter a usability problem in a business application than a website. Users are about half as likely to encounter a problem in consumer software than a business application.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • July 21, 2010 Wondering about the origins of the sample size controversy in the usability profession? Here is an annotated timeline of the major events and papers which continue to shape this topic from 1982-2010.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • June 23, 2010 Whether you're conducting an early stage test of a prototype or late validation, these five tips can make any usability test more credible. The tips both temper skepticism about small samples and help you avoid overstating your findings.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • May 12, 2010 You don't need a random sample to use statistics to make better decisions from your usability data. You do need to know if the users who aren't in your usability tests are different enough than those who are.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • April 7, 2010 QA testers are not adequate substitutes for real users and usability tests are not adequate substitutes for good QA.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • April 1, 2010 Retrospective probing of user actions and intentions allows you to get a reliable benchmark and identify problems with an interface.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • February 9, 2010 In a comparative test, satisfaction scores and completion rates from professional usability test-takers were nearly identical to lab-based users. However, time on task data differed significantly and showed much higher variability. For testing websites intended for a general audience the use of professional testers appears to provide mostly reliable data quickly and for a fraction of the price.[Read More]
 Jeff Sauro • December 8, 2009 Is it possible to get the same data from lab-based tests by having users test themselves? Unmoderated testing appears to provide a cost effective alternative for gathering a lot more usability data with considerably less effort. Additional time is required to filter invalid data such as unrealistically short task times.[Read More]
|