Quantitative Usability, Statistics & Six Sigma by Jeff Sauro
SUM: Single Usability Metric
(Presented at CHI 2005)by Jeff Sauro | April 17, 2005 ::
RSS
SUM is a standardized, summated and single usability metric. It was developed to represent the majority of variation in four common usability metrics used in summative usability tests: task completion rates, task time, satisfaction and error counts. The theoretical foundations of SUM are based on a paper presented at CHI 2005 entitled "A Method to Standardize Usability Metrics into a Single Score." Sauro and Kindlund.
Usability ScoreCard Added June. 2007
The UsabilityScorecard web-application will take raw usability metrics (completion, time, sat, errors and clicks) and calculate confidence intervals and graph the results automatically. You can also combine any combination of the metrics into a 2, 3 or 4 measure combined score. Data can be imported from Excel (.csv) and exported to Word(.rtf).
SUM Calculator
- Why would you want a single usability metric?
The bulk of usability activities are formative, that is, their major intent is to uncover and fix usability problems in a user interface. A single score would not be as beneficial here. It is most beneficial during a benchmarking test or summative assessment when you want to know how usable the application is, as opposed to what the usability problems are. Before you can say how usable something is, you need to be able to measure usability.
Why would you want to measure usability? If you cannot measure the construct of usability, or agree on what accounts for usability in some measurable way, then how will we know if any of the UE activities actually make the product more usable? This is a larger philosophical issue that has been asked in many contexts, here are some examples:
Measurement is at the heart of our scientific method. "Numerical Precision is the very soul of science" D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson, On Growth and Form (1917)
If you can't measure it, you cant manage it. (Old Management Saying)
>When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of and unsatisfactory kind: It may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of Science. Lord (William Thompson) Kelvin, pioneer in thermodynamics and electricity,1891.
View All Articles |
Subscribe to RSS
|
Follow on Twitter |
Get Email Updates
| September 3, 2009 | Mark Sheldon wrote: |
| If 100% of people can complete a task in 0 seconds it cannot be improved upon. How good usability is in reality is likely to be comparitive. A measure is useful as in peer group or competitive benchmarking you can identify best practice. You can also identify "verschlimbessurn" improvements that make things worse. A possible complexity may be if the task is for pleasure. |
| October 28, 2008 | Jeff Sauro wrote: |
| Interesting question. It depends on what you mean by user's experience. This measure, in its original 4 score form has a subjective component, task-level satisfaction. While these questions can vary, they usually ask the user how easy they thought the task was, how satisfied they were with the amount of time and ease in completing it. I believe that approaches what many consider the user's experience, perhaps not completely. Other ways to gauge user experience would be post-test questionnaires, such as the SUS, although we do not include that in the combined metric. |
| October 28, 2008 | Jerry wrote: |
| Could this measure be used to gauge the user's experience with a product or it is more a measure of how usable the product actually is? |
| June 5, 2008 | Joanne Locascion wrote: |
| I am trying to understand if there is a particular number by which something may be deemed or labeled as having "good" usability or "poor" usability. In other words, is a cut-off score. Trying to use this as part of a Master's project. Thanks |
| December 1, 2007 | anonomous wrote: |
| Single Usability Metric |